<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Seminar styles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.logicmatters.net/2008/02/seminar-styles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.logicmatters.net/2008/02/seminar-styles/</link>
	<description>Logic, enthusiasms, sceptical thoughts, and a little LaTeX geekery</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 19:23:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rowsety moid</title>
		<link>http://www.logicmatters.net/2008/02/seminar-styles/comment-page-1/#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>rowsety moid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 13:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logicmatters.net/?p=230#comment-195</guid>
		<description>I wonder whether some of the density is due to the shortening.  A quick comparison on one part - re imaginary elements - left me unsure.  Once he reached the point where imaginaries were defined, the text was pretty much the same in both books; but I thought the way the longer book got to that point was more interesting to read.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I also wonder whether all (current) model theory texts at that level will have a similar problem, or whether some (Chang and Keisler maybe?  Poizat?) would be more approachable.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;BTW, if Amazon is correct, the longer book will be appearing in paperback later this year, priced 50 pounds, which is a lot though, unfortunately, not out of line with prices for many other maths and logic texts.  :(  At least it&#039;s less than half the absurd hardcover price.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Also BTW, re the project of explaining forcing, Hodge&#039;s book Building Models by Games might be included.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder whether some of the density is due to the shortening.  A quick comparison on one part &#8211; re imaginary elements &#8211; left me unsure.  Once he reached the point where imaginaries were defined, the text was pretty much the same in both books; but I thought the way the longer book got to that point was more interesting to read.</p>
<p>I also wonder whether all (current) model theory texts at that level will have a similar problem, or whether some (Chang and Keisler maybe?  Poizat?) would be more approachable.</p>
<p>BTW, if Amazon is correct, the longer book will be appearing in paperback later this year, priced 50 pounds, which is a lot though, unfortunately, not out of line with prices for many other maths and logic texts.  :(  At least it&#8217;s less than half the absurd hardcover price.</p>
<p>Also BTW, re the project of explaining forcing, Hodge&#8217;s book Building Models by Games might be included.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

