<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Craig Smorynski reviews IGT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.logicmatters.net/2009/11/craig-smorynski-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.logicmatters.net/2009/11/craig-smorynski-review/</link>
	<description>Logic, enthusiasms, sceptical thoughts, and a little LaTeX geekery</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 19:23:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clark</title>
		<link>http://www.logicmatters.net/2009/11/craig-smorynski-review/comment-page-1/#comment-800</link>
		<dc:creator>Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 21:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logicmatters.net/?p=726#comment-800</guid>
		<description>Apologies for straying from topic, but I just noticed a ( not new ) brief critique of Maddy by Fefferman

http://math.stanford.edu/~feferman/papers/ASL2000R.pdf

pp8-9.

I expect you&#039;re already aware of this point of view.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apologies for straying from topic, but I just noticed a ( not new ) brief critique of Maddy by Fefferman</p>
<p><a href="http://math.stanford.edu/~feferman/papers/ASL2000R.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://math.stanford.edu/~feferman/papers/ASL2000R.pdf</a></p>
<p>pp8-9.</p>
<p>I expect you&#8217;re already aware of this point of view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

