<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Logic Matters &#187; Gödel&#8217;s theorems</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.logicmatters.net/category/logic/goedels-theorems/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.logicmatters.net</link>
	<description>logical reflections and prejudices : enthusiasms and sceptical thoughts : LaTeX geekery : and my logic books</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 12:39:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Gödel Without Tears, again</title>
		<link>http://www.logicmatters.net/2009/11/godel-without-tears-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.logicmatters.net/2009/11/godel-without-tears-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 16:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Smith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gödel's theorems]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logicmatters.net/?p=713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve updated all the episodes so far to give them what I hope are more useful headers (a bullet-pointed list of topics). The last two episodes have also been more significantly revised. You can get the latest, greatest, versions here.
Two more episodes to follow very soon.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve updated all the episodes so far to give them what I hope are more useful headers (a bullet-pointed list of topics). The last two episodes have also been more significantly revised. You can get the latest, greatest, versions <a href="http://www.logicmatters.net/igt/godel-without-tears/">here</a>.</p>
<p>Two more episodes to follow very soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.logicmatters.net/2009/11/godel-without-tears-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gödel Without Tears &#8212; 6</title>
		<link>http://www.logicmatters.net/2009/11/godel-without-tears-6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.logicmatters.net/2009/11/godel-without-tears-6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 15:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Smith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gödel's theorems]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logicmatters.net/?p=706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest episode showing how a theory like Q can express/capture primitive recursive functions and relations is now online. [As always, I'll be very glad to hear about typos/thinkos.]
Earlier instalments can be found here.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="/resources/pdfs/gwt/GWT06.pdf">The latest episode</a> showing how a theory like Q can express/capture primitive recursive functions and relations is now online. [As always, I'll be very glad to hear about typos/thinkos.]</p>
<p>Earlier instalments can be found <a href="http://www.logicmatters.net/igt/godel-without-tears/">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.logicmatters.net/2009/11/godel-without-tears-6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gödel Without Tears &#8212; 5</title>
		<link>http://www.logicmatters.net/2009/11/godel-without-tears-5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.logicmatters.net/2009/11/godel-without-tears-5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Smith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gödel's theorems]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logicmatters.net/?p=502</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here now is the fifth episode on the idea of a primitive recursive function. The preamble explains why this matters and where this is going. [As always, I'll be very glad to hear about typos/thinkos.]
The previous episodes are available:

Episode 1, Incompleteness &#8212; the very idea (version of Oct. 16)
Episode 2. Incompleteness and undecidability (version of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here now is <a href="http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/teaching_staff/Smith/blogstuff/GWT05.pdf">the fifth episode</a> on the idea of a primitive recursive function. The preamble explains why this matters and where this is going. [As always, I'll be very glad to hear about typos/thinkos.]</p>
<p>The previous episodes are available:</p>
<ol>
<li><a href="http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/teaching_staff/Smith/blogstuff/GWT01.pdf">Episode 1</a>, Incompleteness &#8212; the very idea (version of Oct. 16)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/teaching_staff/Smith/blogstuff/GWT02.pdf">Episode 2</a>. Incompleteness and undecidability (version of Oct. 26)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/teaching_staff/Smith/blogstuff/GWT03.pdf">Episode 3</a>. Two weak arithmetics (version of Nov. 1)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/teaching_staff/Smith/blogstuff/GWT04.pdf">Episode 4</a>. First-order Peano Arithmetic (version of Nov. 1)</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.logicmatters.net/2009/11/godel-without-tears-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gödel Without Tears &#8212; 4</title>
		<link>http://www.logicmatters.net/2009/11/godel-without-tears-4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.logicmatters.net/2009/11/godel-without-tears-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 13:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Smith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gödel's theorems]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logicmatters.net/?p=497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here now is the fourth episode [slightly corrected] which tells you &#8212;  for those who don&#8217;t know &#8212; what first-order Peano Arithmetic is (and also what Sigma_1/Pi_1 wffs are). A thrill a minute, really. Done in a bit of a rush to get it out to students in time, so apologies if the proof-reading [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here now is <a href="http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/teaching_staff/Smith/blogstuff/GWT04.pdf">the fourth episode</a> [slightly corrected] which tells you &#8212;  for those who don&#8217;t know &#8212; what first-order Peano Arithmetic is (and also what Sigma_1/Pi_1 wffs are). A thrill a minute, really. Done in a bit of a rush to get it out to students in time, so apologies if the proof-reading is bad!</p>
<p>Here are the previous episodes:
<ol>
<li><a href="http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/teaching_staff/Smith/blogstuff/GWT01.pdf">Episode 1</a>, Incompleteness &#8212; the very idea (version of Oct. 16)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/teaching_staff/Smith/blogstuff/GWT02.pdf">Episode 2</a>. Incompleteness and undecidability (version of Oct. 26)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/teaching_staff/Smith/blogstuff/GWT03.pdf">Episode 3</a>. Two weak arithmetics (version of Nov. 1)</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.logicmatters.net/2009/11/godel-without-tears-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gödel Without Tears &#8212; 3</title>
		<link>http://www.logicmatters.net/2009/10/godel-without-tears-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.logicmatters.net/2009/10/godel-without-tears-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Smith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gödel's theorems]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logicmatters.net/?p=496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s the third episode (slightly updated to take account of some initial comments). Not anywhere near so exciting as the first two &#8212; but after all that arm-waving generality, we do need to get our hands dirty looking at some actual formal theories of arithmetic, mildly tedious though that is! And you really ought to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s <a href="http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/teaching_staff/Smith/blogstuff/GWT03.pdf">the third episode</a> (slightly updated to take account of some initial comments). Not anywhere near so exciting as the first two &#8212; but after all that arm-waving generality, we <span style="font-style: italic;">do</span> need to get our hands dirty looking at some actual formal theories of arithmetic, mildly tedious though that is! And you really ought to know, e.g., what Robinson Arithmetic is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.logicmatters.net/2009/10/godel-without-tears-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gödel Without Tears &#8212; 2</title>
		<link>http://www.logicmatters.net/2009/10/godel-without-tears-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.logicmatters.net/2009/10/godel-without-tears-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 15:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Smith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gödel's theorems]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logicmatters.net/?p=493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As promised, Episode 2 of Gödel Without Tears (in which we prove sufficiently strong theories are undecidable and incomplete &#8212; just like that!)
As explained, I&#8217;m writing these notes as just-after-the-event handouts for weekly lectures. And each week I&#8217;ll  be checking through the previous handout (and no doubt finding small corrections to make) before I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As promised, <a href="http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/teaching_staff/Smith/blogstuff/GWT02.pdf">Episode 2 of Gödel Without Tears</a> (in which we prove sufficiently strong theories are undecidable and incomplete &#8212; just like that!)</p>
<p>As explained, I&#8217;m writing these notes as just-after-the-event handouts for weekly lectures. And each week I&#8217;ll  be checking through the previous handout (and no doubt finding small corrections to make) before I give the next lecture. So <a href="http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/teaching_staff/Smith/blogstuff/GWT01.pdf">here&#8217;s the latest version of Episode 1, dated 16 October</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.logicmatters.net/2009/10/godel-without-tears-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gödel Without Tears &#8212; 1</title>
		<link>http://www.logicmatters.net/2009/10/godel-without-tears-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.logicmatters.net/2009/10/godel-without-tears-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 10:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Smith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gödel's theorems]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logicmatters.net/?p=491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here, as promised, is the first of a series of lecture handouts (roughly weekly, and about twelve in all) encouragingly titled Gödel Without Tears &#8212; 1.  As is the way with lecture handouts, this was dashed off at great speed, and I don&#8217;t promise that this is free of either typos or thinkos. So [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here, as promised, is the first of a series of lecture handouts (roughly weekly, and about twelve in all) encouragingly titled <a href="http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/teaching_staff/Smith/blogstuff/GWT01.pdf">Gödel Without Tears &#8212; 1.</a>  As is the way with lecture handouts, this was dashed off at great speed, and I don&#8217;t promise that this is free of either typos or thinkos. So do please let me know of any needed corrections, or indeed of any passage which is too unclear/could do with just a little amplification. Enjoy!</p>
<p><span style="font-style: italic;">Later</span>: I&#8217;ve already replaced the first version with a slightly better one &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.logicmatters.net/2009/10/godel-without-tears-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
