## Mendelson: Introduction to Mathematical Logic

Elliot Mendelson’s *Introduction to Mathematical Logic* (Van Nostrand, 1964: pp. 300) was first published in the distinguished and influential company of *The University Series in Undergraduate Mathematics*. It has been much used in graduate courses for philosophers since: a 4th edition was published by Chapman Hall in 1997 (pp. 440), with a slightly expanded 5th edition being published in 2009. I will here compare the first and fourth editions, as these are the ones I know.

Even in the later editions this isn’t, in fact, a very *big* Big Book (many of the added pages of the later editions are due to there now being answers to exercises): the length is kept under control in part by not covering a great deal, and in part by a certain brisk terseness. As the Series title suggests, the intended level of the book is upper undergraduate mathematics, and the book does broadly keep to that aim. Mendelson is indeed pretty clear; however, his style is of its original time, and will strike many modern readers as dry and rather old-fashioned. (Some of the choices of typography are not wonderfully pretty either, and this can make some pages look as if they will be harder going than they really turn out to be.)

*Some details *After a brief introduction, Ch. 1 is on the propositional calculus. It covers semantics first (truth-tables, tautologies, adequate sets of connectives), then an axiomatic proof system. The treatments don’t change much between editions, and will probably only be of interest if you’ve never encountered a Hilbert-style axiomatic system before. The fine print of how Mendelson regards his symbolic apparatus is interesting, however: if you read him carefully, you’ll see that the expressions in his formal systems are not sentences, not expressions of the kind that – on interpretation – can be true or false – but are *schemata*, what he calls statement forms. But this relatively idiosyncratic line about how the formalism is to be read, which for a while (due to Quine’s influence) was oddly popular among philosophers, doesn’t much affect the development.

Ch. 2 is on quantification theory, again in an axiomatic style. The fourth edition adds to the end of the chapter more sections on model theory: there is a longish section on ultra-powers and non-standard analysis, then there’s (too brief) a nod to semantic trees, and finally a new discussion of quantification allowing empty domains. The extra sections in the fourth edition are a definite bonus: without them, there is nothing special to recommend this chapter, if you have worked through the recommendations in §2.2 of the Guide, and in particular, perhaps, the chapters in van Dalen’s book.

Ch. 3 is titled ‘Formal number theory’. It presents a formal version of first-order Peano Arithmetic, and shows you can prove some expected arithmetic theorems within it. Then Mendelson defines the primitive recursive and the (total) recursive functions, shows that these are representable (capturable) in PA. It then considers the arithmetization of syntax, and proves Gödel’s first incompleteness theorem and Rosser’s improvement. The chapter then proves Church’s Theorem about the decidability of arithmetic. One difference between editions is that the later proof of Gödel’s theorem goes via the Diagonalization Lemma; another is that there is added a brief treatment of Löb’s Theorem. At the time of publication of the original addition, this Chapter was a quite exceptionally useful guide thorough the material. But now – at least if you’ve read my Gödel book or the equivalent – then there is probably nothing to particularly divert you here, except that Mendelson does go through *every* single stage of laboriously showing that the relation * m-numbers-a-PA-proof-of-the-sentence-numbered-n* is primitive recursive.

Ch. 4 is on set theory, and – unusually for a textbook – the system presented is NBG (von Neumann/Bernays/Gödel) rather than ZF(C). In the first edition, this chapter is under fifty pages, and evidently the coverage can’t be very extensive and it also probably goes too rapidly for many readers. The revised edition doesn’t change the basic treatment (much) but adds sections comparing NBG to a number of other set theories. So while this chapter certainly can’t replace the introductions to set theory recommended in the Guide, it could be worth skimming briskly through the chapter in later editions to learn about NBG and other deviations from ZF.

The original Ch. 5 on effective computability starts with a discussion of Markov algorithms (again, unusual for a textbook), then treats Turing algorithms, then Herbrand-Gödel computability and proves the equivalence of the three approaches. There are discussions of recursive enumerability and of the Kleene-Mostowski hierarchy. And the chapter concludes with a short discussion of undecidable problems. In the later edition, the material is significantly rearranged, with Turing taking pride of place and other treatments of computability relegated to near the end of the chapter; also more is added on decision problems. Since the introductory texts mentioned in the Guide don’t talk about Markov or Herbrand-Gödel computability, you might want to dip into the chapter briefly to round out your education!

I should mention the appendices. The first edition has a very interesting though brisk appendix giving a version of Schütte’s variation on a Gentzen-style consistency proof for PA. Rather sadly, perhaps, this is missing from later editions. The fourth edition has instead an appendix on second-order logic.

*Summary verdict *Moderately accessible and extremely important in its time (the first modern mathematical logic textbook), there is now really not so much reason to plough through this book end-to-end. It doesn’t have the charm and readability of Kleene 1952, and there are better, more modern, separate introductions to each of the main topics . You could *skim* the early chapters if you’ve never seen axiomatic systems of logic being used in earnest: it’s good for the soul. The appendix that appears only in the first edition is interesting for enthusiasts. Look at the section on non-standard analysis in the revised editions. If set theory is your thing, you should dip in to get the headline news about NBG. And some might want to expand their knowledge of definitions of computation by looking at Ch. 5.

Rowsety MoidI saw your comment about the PA consistency proof in the FOM archives the other day, and it reminded me that I’d been meaning to say: it looks like it’s back in the latest, just out, 6th edition. I think you may well deserve some credit for its reappearance.